Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2001 01:31:02 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: fork on win95
Message-ID:	<20010720013102.U730@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygdev <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<005101c11036$06368800$806410ac AT local> <20010719112939 DOT A5093 AT redhat DOT com> <008001c1109d$40bca7e0$806410ac AT local>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<008001c1109d$40bca7e0$806410ac@local>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 07:53:31AM +1000

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 07:53:31AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> 
> 
> > Hmm.  As I said, I actually tried my changes under Windows 95, so
> > this will be difficult to track down, since I can't duplicate it.
> 
> I'll see what sort of info I can generate for you, but I'm still pleading
> time shortage right now. I'll generate a strace as a minimum (ie strace
> sh -c ls) which should show the failure to fork(). Anything else that might
> spark neurons?
> 
> > Thanks for not saying "It worked fine in B20.1", by the way.  :-)
> 
> I forgot to mention that!. Doh!.

But it worked fine in 1.1.8!!!

Corinna

- Raw text -