Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 7 Jul 2001 10:37:43 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Looking into setup problems
Message-ID:	<20010707103743.B7944@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010706162127 DOT A2888 AT redhat DOT com> <20010706183156 DOT A4441 AT redhat DOT com> <VA DOT 00000853 DOT 023e1322 AT thesoftwaresource DOT com> <20010706235846 DOT A5882 AT redhat DOT com> <20010707004826 DOT A6462 AT redhat DOT com> <006101c106ee$a77db0e0$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<006101c106ee$a77db0e0$6464648a@ca.boeing.com>; from mchase@ix.netcom.com on Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 07:07:27AM -0700

On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 07:07:27AM -0700, Michael A. Chase wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
>Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 21:48
>Subject: Re: Looking into setup problems
>
>
>> On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 11:58:46PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> >I hate to say this, but I have become somewhat disenchanted with this
>> >prev/curr/test stuff.
>>
>> I've taken a stab at fixing the current behavior, despite my
>> disenchantment.
>>
>> If you select "test" then the test version of sources will be
>> downloaded/ installed, etc.
>
>Once we have Categories working, you could change the Prev, Curr, Test radio
>buttons to plain buttons which set the state of all visible packages.
>"Skip", "Source", and "Source Only" buttons would be handy then too.  As
>wide as the package select dialog box is getting, we will have lots of room
>for buttons.

But why not use the current method that we have for packages?  Use the
same multiple select method that DJ used for packages to set the defaults.

I don't know what this method is named.  It's not a radio button, it is
a... ?

cgf

- Raw text -