Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 5 Jul 2001 00:38:55 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Setup.exe 2.78.2.2 test satisfactory
Message-ID:	<20010705003855.A20476@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<005f01c101e3$4471fed0$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <20010702001752 DOT A20206 AT redhat DOT com> <004101c102d4$43517a20$0300a8c0 AT ufo> <20010702144536 DOT C12135 AT redhat DOT com> <004c01c103b1$60fbe460$0300a8c0 AT ufo> <010101c103cb$eb7607f0$0300a8c0 AT ufo>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<010101c103cb$eb7607f0$0300a8c0@ufo>; from trevorforbes@ozemail.com.au on Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:54:49PM +0930

On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:54:49PM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
>Sorry, I spoke too soon, when I did a further net tests, I still see
>incorrect package choices in the experimental.
>
>For example using bash with "view full"
>previous  2.05-6  ->  2.05-5
>current    2.05-6  ->  keep
>Exp        2.05-6  ->  2.05-4
>
>Note "expermental" is picking up a earler package before "previous"

This should be fixed now.  My code which ensured that older versions
didn't get placed after newer versions was still broken.

>At least the uninstalls have gone.....

Well, they're not entirely gone.  They still show up if you do a "back"
after having installed a bunch of packages.  I'm wondering if this is
a bug or a feature, though.

I'm also wondering if I got the paradigm wrong since there are so
many problems with this.

cgf

- Raw text -