Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<009001c1017d$99352020$6464648a@ca.boeing.com>
From:	"Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
To:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
	<cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<000201c1014a$19cf53b0$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <04c901c10160$4005e1a0$806410ac AT local>
Subject:	Re: Sample setup.ini
Date:	Sat, 30 Jun 2001 08:50:27 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

That's even better.

Chris,
What testing would you need to be willing to replace setup.exe 2.57 with
2.81+ with CATEGORY disabled?
--
Mac :})
** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. **
Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>;
<cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 05:29
Subject: Re: Sample setup.ini


> It's easy enough to release a setup.exe built with partial as the default
> list display and CATEGORY disabled - only three lines need changing.
>
> That way I don't think a separate branch needs maintaining.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
> To: <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 7:43 PM
> Subject: Sample setup.ini
>
> > I think it would be very useful to get out a version of setup.exe that
can
> > recognize and ignore the new markers in setup.ini ().  That way you
could
> > start including the markers in the production setup.ini before everyone
> > switches over to a setup.exe that actually uses them.
> >
> > I am willing to provide an alternate branch to setup.exe if you are
> > agreeable.  I think it would be enough to start with the currently
> released
> > version's source then add the changes to iniparse and inilex with the
> > functions that process the new markers NOOPed.

- Raw text -