Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From:	<earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3B20ADB7.3B3F5235@yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 08 Jun 2001 06:49:27 -0400
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	Cygwin Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	John Fortin <fortinj AT attglobal DOT net>
CC:	Cygwin Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: File Access Oddness (
References:	<000d01c0ef69$51faa840$44493209 AT fishkill DOT ibm DOT com> <3B1FB91A DOT 23AF129 AT yahoo DOT com> <00aa01c0efad$9373bbb0$8ba9e020 AT fortin>

John Fortin wrote:
> 
> > John Fortin wrote:
> > >
> > > Is the following a bug??  I do not remember needing '*.exe' to access a
> file
> > > before, especially when 'ls' does not show the extension.
> > >
> >
> > Nope, it's a long standing feature.
> >
> 
> I hate to even ask this, but why??? If a file has an extension, shouldn't
> 'ls' show it or is this a special feature for
> exe extensions?  

Yes.  Mainly to facilitate executing the binary without having to supply
the .exe portion of the file name.

> mv and cp and rm all failed because of the missing
> extension.
> 

Yes.  Because the file name is actually foo.exe and not foo.

-- 
Earnie.
Use the source, Luke. (tm)

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- Raw text -