Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<00aa01c0efad$9373bbb0$8ba9e020@fortin>
From:	"John Fortin" <fortinj AT attglobal DOT net>
To:	"Cygwin Developers" <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<000d01c0ef69$51faa840$44493209 AT fishkill DOT ibm DOT com> <3B1FB91A DOT 23AF129 AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: File Access Oddness (
Date:	Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:57:13 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

> John Fortin wrote:
> >
> > Is the following a bug??  I do not remember needing '*.exe' to access a
file
> > before, especially when 'ls' does not show the extension.
> >
>
> Nope, it's a long standing feature.
>

I hate to even ask this, but why??? If a file has an extension, shouldn't
'ls' show it or is this a special feature for
exe extensions?  mv and cp and rm all failed because of the missing
extension.

John

- Raw text -