Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2001 15:13:44 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: _cygwin_S_IEXEC we hardly knew ye
Message-ID:	<20010508151344.N24200@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygdev <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010508001315 DOT A4844 AT redhat DOT com> <20010508112507 DOT A16420 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20010508080034 DOT A21811 AT redhat DOT com> <20010508144110 DOT M24200 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<20010508144110.M24200@cygbert.vinschen.de>; from vinschen@redhat.com on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 02:41:10PM +0200

On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 02:41:10PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 08:00:34AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 11:25:07AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 12:13:15AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >> For 1.3.3, I am going to implement a "Don't check this directory for
> > >> execute bits" option to mount.  I'd like to have this on by default for
> > >> smb drives.  Does this sound like a good idea?
> > >
> > >It sounds like a good idea for users who know what's going on...
> > 
> > You're kidding, right?
> 
> Yes and No.
> 
> Yes, I think it's a good idea to get speed improvements.
> 
> No, I fear the load of mails in the mailing list with clueless
> admins (that's what the ACFs are for, too) which installed Cygwin
> on a SMB drive for their users.
> 
> Yes, probably it's better to live with them and it's not as bad
> as I think.

Outch, if you substitute "Yes" with "No" and vice versa, my posting
gets sorta sense... or... ehrm... anyway, you know what I mean I hope.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

- Raw text -