Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:06:41 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	1.3.1 *is* slower
Message-ID:	<20010427160641.A11039@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i

It is true that 1.3.1 is slower than 1.1.8.  I benchmarked it on my NT 2K
dual processor 300MHZ system.

A config.status --recheck in my gdb build directory takes a minute 1 second
with 1.3.1, 52 seconds with 1.1.8, and 48 seconds with 1.1.5.

Not a very encouraging trend.

Anybody have any ideas?  This is usually a sign of an extra disk open somewhere
but I don't see anything obvious.

cgf

- Raw text -