Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	RE: Looking for something to work on...
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:24:13 +1000
Message-ID:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08EF1D@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic:	Looking for something to work on...
Thread-Index:	AcDMVNJBbITixkDuQDCXKUAETJYIDgAAAWRg
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	"John Fortin" <fortinj AT attglobal DOT net>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id UAA23588

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:32 AM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: John Fortin; cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: Looking for something to work on...
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:20:10AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >> I guess we should move this discussion to cygwin-developers...
> >> 
> >> John was asking for something interesting to do.  He 
> suggested POSIX
> >> IPC stuff, which I (possibly erroneously) assumed was the 
> same as what
> >> cygipc provided.
> >
> >It is. See http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xsh/ipc.html -
> >it's essential sysV IPC. To some extent these are equivalent 
> to mmap and
> >the like, but I don't think mmap is cross process-persistent 
> in cygwin
> >(And I don't know if it's meant to be). We could of course 
> implement shm
> >with disk backing not VM backing, but that might cause issues with Gb
> >allocs :]
> 
> I could actually donate some Windows code that I wrote a few years ago
> to emulate sys v semaphores.  It wasn't complete but it might 
> be useful
> as either a starting point or a laughing point.

Thanks. And then there were 2.

Rob

> 
> cgf
> 

- Raw text -