Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/04/18/22:35:05
AFAIK it's by design.
Adding new subdirs with separate packages typically involves a new
distribution.
The --norecurse is to prevent changes to configure.[in|ac] at the top of
a set of related packages forcing reconfiguration for the sub-packages.
This has the side effect of not configuring added packages.
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 12:24 PM
> To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: bz2lib autoconfiguration ??
>
>
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> > >Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:13:55PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> > >> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:07:43PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> > >> >> >Hmm...
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >make clean && make
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >This doesn't create the configuration needed for
> > >> >> >i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/bz2lib. :(
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Do you have the latest CVS version?
> > >> >
> > >> >Yes!
> > >>
> > >> And, you reconfigured?
> > >>
> > >
> > >Hmm... No, I thought that that should happen via
> dependency checking.
> > >Makefile.in changes so reconfiguration should happen and
> create the new
> > >directory and perform configuration for it.
> > >
> > >I'm I just dreaming or is this the way it should happen?
> >
> > I don't know. The mechanism in winsup/Makefile.in is similar to
> > a lot of Makefile.in's in the repository. They invoke
> >
> > config.status --recheck
> >
> > when configure changes. This will rerun configure but it
> does so with
> > the '--no-recursion' switch which seems to avoid creating new
> > directories.
> >
> > I don't know if this is by accident or by design, though.
> >
>
> Could you ask Alexandre? If not I'll see what I can find from the
> autoconf archives.
>
> Earnie.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> Do You Yahoo!?
>
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
- Raw text -