Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From:	<earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3ADE2AA9.B3314454@yahoo.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:00:41 -0400
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	Cygwin Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ANONYMOUS_STRUCT/UNION in w32api
References:	<20010419005222 DOT X15005 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20010418191255 DOT A1770 AT redhat DOT com> <3ADE271F DOT E563C431 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010418194921 DOT A6060 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 07:45:35PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:52:22AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >The latest change to w32api related to the ANONYMOUS_STRUCT and
> >> >ANONYMOUS_UNION problem breaks applications which doesn't include
> >> ><windows.h> but all needed header files separately. Each of the
> >> >affected files should be able to define that stuff by themselves.
> >> >
> >> >May I suggest creating a new header, say "anon.h", which contains
> >> >that stuff and is included by all affected files? Or, maybe it's
> >> >only at the wrong place and could be moved to, say winnt.h?
> >>
> >> Maybe we need something more generic.  Linux has something like
> >> features.h but we obviously can't use that name.
> >>
> >
> >It's a bug in cinstall source.  I've sent a patch.
> 
> Why is it a bug?  It's been working for a year.
> 

It's a bug because cinstall is using functions implicitly prototyped by
not using #include <windows.h>.

> You should be able to include individual header files.
> 

IIRC, MSDN discourages it.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- Raw text -