Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3ABAC557.CE1EAEA8@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:39:03 -0500
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
CC:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup wishes -- any volunteers
References:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF02E295 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>

Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > The last time it made a difference was where I was forced to delay
> > a new net release for almost a year and a half for various silly
> > reasons.
> >
> > cgf
> >
> 
> A side-question: could volunteers have made a release during that period
> (if they got their act together?)

Probably not.  AFAIRC, that was back when cygwin was distributed as a
monolithic "full.exe" which contained not only cygwin itself, but all of
the other packages and utilities.  Just too big of a mess for any entity
other than cygnus to try and make a release.  Now, with the new package
structure -- sure, rolling releases (and even "non-sanctioned" binary
builds of cygwin itself) are possible. Viva la GPL.

--Chuck

- Raw text -