Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:38:32 +0300
From:	Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.45) Personal
Reply-To:	Egor Duda <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization:	DEO
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<1983285237.20010321133832@logos-m.ru>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: State of the DLL, mark 2?
In-reply-To:	<20010320101715.K32706@redhat.com>
References:	<20010319203650 DOT A30559 AT redhat DOT com>
	<907012433 DOT 20010320162719 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010320091254 DOT F32706 AT redhat DOT com>
	<2710465067 DOT 20010320172451 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010320101715 DOT K32706 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Hi!

Tuesday, 20 March, 2001 Christopher Faylor cgf AT redhat DOT com wrote:

>>can  you  give a little hint here? should i strip appropriate sections
>>from libc.a or it's better to build newlib with -DMALLOC_PROVIDED ?

CF> When I last did this, I removed all of the functions from libc.a with
CF> ar.  I didn't know about -DMALLOC_PROVIDED.  It would probably work, though.

well, i've managed to build it with -DMALLOC_PROVIDED, though it was a
bit  tricky,  and  it  turned  out  that cygwin1.dll is not the one to
blame.  i  fear  that  it's bug in ash -- it fails to evaluate complex
expressions.  attached  is testcase (as minimal as i could have worked
out). to run, unpack it to /cygdrive/c/temp/ and then

cd /cygdrive/c/temp/test/build/i586-pc-cygwin/sourceware/
./crash.sh

i'm  not  an  expert  in  ash  internals,  so  probably  someone  more
experienced  will  step  forward. does ash have some restrictions like
buffer length for single expression? or expression depth?

ash is ash-20010129 from latest/

Egor.            mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19

- Raw text -