delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:20:42AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-03/msg01276.html Ah. I stopped reading all of the python nonense a long time ago. I don't know anything about python and watching people continually attempting to build it was excruciating. I pretty much just kill any message that mentions python now. >pthread_kill is current defined in pthread.h as int >pthread_kill(pthread_t *, int sig); > >it is also defined in sys/signal.h as >int pthread_kill(pthread_t, int sig); > >the definition in sys/signal.h is the posixly correct one. Then that's the one that we should be using. Just nuke the old one. AFAICT, you're the first person to actually try to use the pthread stuff and make it work correctly. If Cygwin's implementation was wrong then I don't see how any programs could be ported to it. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |