Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:36:17 +0100
X-Mailer:	KMail [version 1.1.99]
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<00121910474600 DOT 28008 AT cygbert> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001219104423 DOT 021aafc8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20001219105709 DOT A8286 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20001219105709.A8286@redhat.com>
Subject:	Re: RFD: remove(3)
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<0012191936170F.28008@cygbert>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id NAA11023

On Tuesday 19 December 2000 16:57, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:44:35AM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
> >At 04:47 AM 12/19/2000, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>The remove(3) call in newlib is implemented as a simple call to
> >> unlink(2).
> >>
> >>SUSv2/Linux/OpenBSD on the other hand define remove(3) as follows:
> >>
> >>   If path does not name a directory, remove(path) is equivalent to
> >> unlink(path). If path names a directory, remove(path) is
> >> equivalent to rmdir(path).
> >>
> >>I would plead to implement our own remove(3) call, overriding the
> >> newlib implementation. AFAICS, we can't change the newlib
> >> implementation because newlib doesn't know of rmdir(2) at all.
> >>
> >>Thoughts?
> >
> >Do it!;-)
>
> Sure.

Ok.

Corinna

- Raw text -