Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A2B5AF5.7FAD57C0@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 04 Dec 2000 09:51:01 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygdev <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-SMP i686)
X-Accept-Language:	de, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygdev <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygcheck floppy checking
References:	<Pine DOT NEB DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10012031636500 DOT 25290-100000 AT cesium DOT clock DOT org>

Matt wrote:
> 
> I've noticed that cygcheck was taking an extraordinary amount of time to
> execute on my laptop. This appears to be because my external floppy drive
> is not hooked up, which begs the question:
> 
> Should cygcheck bother checking the floppy drives (a: and b:)? Or, should
> a switch be added to eliminate floppy drive checking?

I think a switch would be ok but not only for floppies. The same can
happen for CD-ROM drives with some laptops. So an option like
--ignore X: or something similar would be a way.

On the other hand, how often do you use `cygcheck'? And most of the
users aren't aware of the problem anyway. So they will get `trapped'
regardless whether there's that option or not.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
mailto:vinschen AT redhat DOT com

- Raw text -