Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:22:54 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup.exe cygdrive patch
Message-ID:	<20001106122254.C2263@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<20001106090434 DOT G196 AT dothill DOT com> <20001106111342 DOT B1289 AT redhat DOT com> <20001106115142 DOT L196 AT dothill DOT com> <200011061718 DOT MAA30990 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To:	<200011061718.MAA30990@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:18:11PM -0500

On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:18:11PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> Should I have broken the patch into two pieces?
>
>If Chris hadn't approved the cygwin parts, I would have done it
>myself.  But, the two parts *could* have been done as two patches,
>with one dependent on the other.  Or not.  Doesn't matter, really.
>
>The important thing is that you *did* something - we're not going to
>complain when people help out!

Enthusiastic ditto!

I just approved the additional patches to save DJ some work since he's
not officially on the project anymore.

cgf

- Raw text -