Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<20000919123934.25440.qmail@web110.yahoomail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Sep 2000 05:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: weird mount/ls behaviour
To:	Matt <matt AT use DOT net>, cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0

--- Matt <matt AT use DOT net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:36:27PM -0700, Matt wrote:
> > >mount never seems to return an error if it can't qualify the win32
> > >path supplied.
> >
> > Correct.  It never has and it is not intended to do so, AFAIK.
> 
> huh, ok. Why does 'ls' not show the bad mount point at all and 'ls -l' does?
> This was the weird behaviour part of my report.
> 

It's an invalid mount point, results are unpredicatable and undefined.  The
patch will eliminate that type of invalid mount point by not allowing it to
occur.

Cheers,

=====
--- <http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com> ---
   Earnie Boyd: <mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
            __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__
Cygwin Newbies: <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/>
           __Minimalist GNU for Windows__
    Mingw Home: <http://www.mingw.org/>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/

- Raw text -