Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2000/09/14/13:53:38
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 05:37:07PM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>On Thursday 14 Sep 00, DJ Delorie writes:
>>
>> > I would say this is a defect, albeit a minor one, and perhaps not
>> > worth fixing.
>>
>> In cygcheck, *all* bugs are worth fixing. This is one of the few
>> programs that absolutely *must* do the right thing, because we use it
>> to diagnose user problems.
>
>In that case, I think that cygcheck.cc will require two separate path
>lists, one for searching programs and one for searching dll's. The
>current problem stems from using the same data structure to serve both
>purposes.
>
>I would volunteer to have a go at this, but it would be some weeks
>before I could get started.
Since cygcheck has been like this for some time, I think we can afford
to wait.
If someone else wants to step in, though, please notify us here.
cgf
- Raw text -