Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:55:34 -0400
Message-Id:	<200008312055.QAA25395@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	cgf AT cygnus DOT com
CC:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20000831165024.A15210@cygnus.com> (message from Chris Faylor on
	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:50:24 -0400)
Subject:	Re: testsuite
References:	<20000831165024 DOT A15210 AT cygnus DOT com>

The rule is, as best I can tell, this structure:

* the directory where the makefile has "make check" capability,
* subdirectory testsuite
* subdirectories package.*
* optionally more subdirectories
* files *.exp

If you changed winsup/Makefile.in to support "make check" then there
would have to be src/winsup/testsuite/*/*.exp

Note: you can have *more* subdirectories under testsuite/package.*,
but not *less*.

So, this would be feasible:

src/winsup
	testsuite
		cygwin.*
			winsup.api/winsup.exp (etc)
		w32api.*
		mingw.*

Personally, I'd prefer the testsuites under the packages, but that's
just to keep the mess localized.

- Raw text -