Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:06:06 -0400
To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: Any better now?
Message-ID:	<20000824180606.C15203@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<20000824000822 DOT A10979 AT cygnus DOT com> <39A5206F DOT 15DD74F8 AT cygnus DOT com> <39A52391 DOT C958ECD5 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000824172002 DOT A10098 AT cygnus DOT com> <39A59956 DOT CD0555FD AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To:	<39A59956.CD0555FD@cygnus.com>; from vinschen@cygnus.com on Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 11:53:26PM +0200

On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 11:53:26PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Chris Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:30:57PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >> Chris Faylor wrote:
>> >> > I've checked in some patches to cygwin which fix inetd/telnet operation
>> >> > for me.  Do they work for you, Corinna?  I haven't tried sshd yet.
>> >
>> >BTW: You can't compare inetd/sshd operations since inetd uses
>> >service manager operations. The inetd child isn't a real child
>> >process but a thread which is forked by the service manager.
>> 
>> How about now.  I found a problem in syslog which would cause core dumps
>> depending on the state of the stack.  I also found a problem in select()
>> which would cause the "double character presses" required for ssh.
>> 
>> This seems to work for me now but our DLLs were subtly different so maybe
>> it's still broken.
>
>Another interesting(?) hint: On `ps', ps itself isn't visible
>in the process list.

I don't see this.  Are you running the latest version of ps?

ps -ef shows me two inetd process and ps.  ps by itself shows ps.

Could you send your config.status file when you send the DLL?

cgf

- Raw text -