Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<20000822121225.16018.qmail@web115.yahoomail.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Aug 2000 05:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Eliminating monolithic winsup.h
To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0

--- Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> wrote:
> 
> One thing that I'm not 100% sure about is relying on header file ordering.
> Currently, I've tried to keep everything flat.  That means that .h files do
> not include other .h files even if they depend on them.
> 

Won't that make it harder to determine dependencies?  So if I have header b.h
that requires header a.h and I don't #include <a.h> within b.h then how do I
determine dependencies?

Cheers,

=====
---
   Earnie Boyd: <mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
            __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__
Cygwin Newbies: <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/>
           __Minimalist GNU for Windows__
  Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32/>
    Mingw Home: <http://www.mingw.org/>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

- Raw text -