Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:46:18 -0400
To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: Extending cygwin's process table
Message-ID:	<20000719104618.B17347@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<20000718234319 DOT A16333 AT cygnus DOT com> <200007191231 DOT IAA23425 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To:	<200007191231.IAA23425@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 08:31:34AM -0400

On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 08:31:34AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> It may still not be feasible to use cygwin pids as windows pids
>
>This isn't possible because unix preserves pids across exec() but
>Windows doesn't.  If you can fix *that* problem, then maybe...

Yeah, I am well aware of the problem but I have an idea...

cgf

- Raw text -