delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 11:00:12PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: >I don't think this is any different than any other time we've added >functionality to the dll. Every time we export a new function, we >create the opportunity for new programs to not work with old DLLs. >Aside from bug fixing, this is how we define "progress". > >I don't see a problem with your proposed change. > >However, watch out for the *library* compatibility stuff. Don't >forget the ctype disaster. > >> The error will be something like "entry point cygwin_user_data not >> found". > >More likely, something like "Error loading program" or "program not >found". Windows isn't very helpful with its error messages. Or are >you using LoadLibrary to access this new function? It's data not a function. I didn't make that clear. I could still use LoadLibrary to access it but if I did that, I think I'd lose the benefit of the change. I'll check for the actual error message when I finish making the changes. I'm basically moving all of the per_process data into the DLL where, IMO, it has always belonged. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |