Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:04:50 -0400
Message-Id:	<200006231704.NAA09270@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	Jason DOT Tishler AT dothill DOT com
CC:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
In-reply-to:	<395395CE.661F12B8@dothill.com> (message from Jason Tishler on
	Fri, 23 Jun 2000 12:52:30 -0400)
Subject:	Re: Cygdrive Path Prefix Patch Issue
References:	<20000615150243 DOT 27071 DOT qmail AT web116 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <20000615123531 DOT F5388 AT cygnus DOT com> <395395CE DOT 661F12B8 AT dothill DOT com>

> Does anyone object to the name cygwin_get_cygdrive_prefixes?  Or, to
> be more explicit, adding the following declaration to sys/mount.h:
> 
>     int cygwin_get_cygdrive_prefixes (char *user, char *system);

Is there a good reason not to use the existing cygwin_internal()
function for this?  It's clearly an internal function, only used by
mount.

- Raw text -