Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	"Paul K. Fisher" <pfisher AT plexware DOT com>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Reason for cover functions in pthread.cc
Date:	Mon, 8 May 2000 20:04:05 -0500
Message-ID:	<000701bfb952$78bca8f0$6401a8c0@jupiter>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<20000508115052.K13670@cygnus.com>

> From: Chris Faylor, Monday, May 08, 2000 10:51 AM
>
> On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 10:43:31PM -0500, Paul K. Fisher wrote:
> >Is there a reason to keep the cover functions in pthread.cc?
>
> I don't know of any reason for this practice.  It has
> always mystified me.  Do things __pthread_attr_init
> exist in the spec?
No, not that I can see.  These are simply gratuitous.  I'll remove them in
my next patch.

paul

- Raw text -