delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 10:43:31PM -0500, Paul K. Fisher wrote: >Is there a reason to keep the cover functions in pthread.cc? These simply >call "__" prefixed versions in thread.cc, where the real implementation is >provided. > >For example: >int >pthread_attr_init (pthread_attr_t * attr) >{ > return __pthread_attr_init (attr); >} I don't know of any reason for this practice. It has always mystified me. Do things __pthread_attr_init exist in the spec? If so, the place to handle this is in cygwin.din not in a wrapper function. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |