Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 2 May 2000 18:13:58 -0400
To:	cygdev <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [RFC] Is that error mapping correct?
Message-ID:	<20000502181358.B3374@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cgf AT cygnus DOT com,
	cygdev <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
References:	<390F4D94 DOT C6E8E9F9 AT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.1.12i
In-Reply-To:	<390F4D94.C6E8E9F9@vinschen.de>; from corinna@vinschen.de on Tue, May 02, 2000 at 11:50:12PM +0200

On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 11:50:12PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I wonder if the error mapping is correct in case of ERROR_BAD_NETPATH.
>errno.cc maps that error to ENXIO ("No such device or address")
>while I'm sure the correct mapping would be ENOENT ("No such file
>or directory") because
>
>	$ cat /foo/bar/baz
>	cat: /foo/bar/baz: No such file or directory
>and
>	$ cat //f/bar/baz
>	cat: //f/bar/baz: No such file or directory
>
>looks fine while
>
>	$ cat //foo/bar/baz
>	cat: //foo/bar/baz: No such device or address
>
>seems somewhat strange. Have I missed something, perhaps?

I don't know.  Is there some UNIX equivalent that we could use for
testing?  It is nice to differentiate between a non-existent file and a
non-existent host but I agree that the current error doesn't make much
sense.

cgf

- Raw text -