Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
Date:	Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:56:08 -0600 (CST)
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is binutils correct?
In-Reply-To:	<20000319152515.B10069@cygnus.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.HPP.3.96.1000320125256.18796G-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Chris Faylor wrote:

> I remember the discussion but I thought you'd fixed the problem rather
> than dropping back to an earlier version.  I guess I remembered wrong.

I wish! Actually, it's really not worth the bother, since the development
tree was till recently simply too unstable for x86-pe. I'm now using the
latest CVS, added a few local changes, and I believe I now have a pretty
stable configuration. There is still a problem with gas relocation in my
code, but Doug Hunt has a fix (but no assignment on file yet, sigh) for
it.

There is now effort underway for the next official binutils release after
a long hiatus. Sadly, the x86-pe backend is going to be broken; let's see
if I can get at least the minimal stuff in the next week or so to get it
to at least create runnable programs.

Regards,
Mumit

- Raw text -