delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Message-ID: | <38C40D10.7907CED4@cygnus.com> |
Date: | Mon, 06 Mar 2000 11:54:56 -0800 |
From: | Eric Christopher <echristo AT cygnus DOT com> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-1.5.0 i686) |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Changing cygwin-developers "charter"? |
References: | <20000306144552 DOT A15739 AT cygnus DOT com> |
> Personally, I am happy with the status quo here but I was wondering > if anyone else felt that we should open this up for discussions of > things like bfd/binutils/gcc, etc. > I wouldn't mind it being a discussion list for people developing ports for cygwin. More of a people developing the cygwin env. as opposed to people developing with cygwin. Make sense? -eric
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |