delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2000/03/06/14:53:18

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <38C40D10.7907CED4@cygnus.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 11:54:56 -0800
From: Eric Christopher <echristo AT cygnus DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-1.5.0 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: Changing cygwin-developers "charter"?
References: <20000306144552 DOT A15739 AT cygnus DOT com>

> Personally, I am happy with the status quo here but I was wondering
> if anyone else felt that we should open this up for discussions of
> things like bfd/binutils/gcc, etc.
> 

I wouldn't mind it being a discussion list for people developing ports
for cygwin.  More of a people developing the cygwin env. as opposed to
people developing with cygwin.  Make sense?

-eric

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019