delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2000/02/29/09:59:33

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:58:07 -0500
Message-Id: <200002291458.JAA20532@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
CC: khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU
In-reply-to: <20000229005620.A4945@cygnus.com> (message from Chris Faylor on
Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:56:20 -0500)
Subject: Re: FS layout issues for v1.1 (eg., /bin and /usr/bin)
References: <Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1000228182811 DOT 25928A-100000 AT hp2 DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> <200002290116 DOT UAA22995 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000229005620 DOT A4945 AT cygnus DOT com>

> The problem is that you can't pick and choose.

I know.  I agree that Mumit's idea is good.

> Mumit also suggested in private email that "cygcheck" do a little
> rooting around in the directory structure to report how things were
> laid out just in case an adverturous user decides to remove the
> /usr/bin symbolic link.

I don't see a problem with that.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019