Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2000/02/28/08:12:57
--- DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
-8<-
>
> bzip2 takes a ton more CPU than gzip, for a less-than-corresponding
> increase in compression, and is less popular (i.e. less likely to be
> found on a standard linux install, for example). The gains in file
> size are not that exciting given the vastly larger amount of CPU
> needed to deal with them, but when you have to transfer big files over
> the Internet, it is still a net gain. However, for cygwin, there are
> no technical reasons not to switch.
>
> In my case, where I'm creating tarballs all the time, the extra CPU
> needed to build them is annoying, but I can be convinced to switch for
> the official distributions.
>
I'm hoping to convince you _NOT_ to switch. All the bzip2 files I get I end up
doing bunzip2 foo.bz2 && gzip foo just to convert them. As you've stated bzip2
isn't standard and the archive tools that people have don't support it yet,
especially on Win32.
> Plus, you can't use "tar xvfz ..." to extract them :-(
>
I believe there exists a patch to add a new filter switch.
Regards,
=====
---
Earnie Boyd: <mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
__Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__
Cygwin Newbies: <http://www.freeyellow.com/members5/gw32/index.html>
__Minimalist GNU for Windows__
Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32>
Mingw Home: (Coming Soon)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
- Raw text -