Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
Date:	Sun, 27 Feb 2000 20:16:05 -0600 (CST)
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
Reply-To:	Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To:	Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
cc:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: next net release preview
In-Reply-To:	<s1sr9e0ibi8.fsf@jaist.ac.jp>
Message-ID:	<Pine.HPP.3.96.1000227201233.20300B-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On 26 Feb 2000, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote:

> 
> The architecture names used in some packages diverge
> `i686-cygwin', `i686-cygwin32' and `i686-pc-cygwin'.
> 
> cygwin : i686-cygwin
> gdb : i686-pc-cygwin32
> binutils : i686-pc-cygwin32
> 

I just checked my local copy, and binutils does use i686-pc-cygwin
and not i686-pc-cygwin32. Could someone who's downloaded the preview
binaries please double check and report if there's an inconsistency?

Regards,
Mumit

- Raw text -