delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2000/02/24/15:47:54

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id: <200002242052.OAA08865@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
To: "Parker, Ron" <rdparker AT butlermfg DOT org>
cc: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com, "cgf AT cygnus DOT com" <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: Installer (WAS: RE: next net release preview)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:07:23 CST."
<200002242010 DOT OAA10173 AT thor DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:52:33 -0600
From: Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>

"Parker, Ron" <rdparker AT butlermfg DOT org> writes:

> (1) What is the target timeframe for having something created?
> 
> (2) What is expected/needed of an installer?

Same question here. We had talked about getting an installer for the
*base runtime* package, and then .tar.gz (or if someone wants to do
.rpm/.deb etc) for everything else.

I just downloaded Inno Setup which is free, and maybe I'll do up a
simple one and see what happens. Nice thing about it is that it will
allow you to run a program after installation, and that's something
that can be used to create a shell script and what not.
  
> My personal thoughts are that long term I would love to port RPM for CYGWIN
> and Windows so that it plugged into the standard Windows "Add/Remove
> Software" mechanism.  But this is a long term goal that I had been waiting
> to do until after the next (this) net release.

I think that's a very good project since that allows us "native"
compliance while maintaining the advantages of .rpm.

I really would like to avoid touching InstallShield, especially given that
the version I have is a GUI driven that takes forever to put together for
packages with lots of directories and lots of files. Also, my version
doesn't allow running an application after installation finishes (post
install scripts are very useful).

Regards,
Mumit

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019