Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
Date:	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 17:55:19 -0600 (CST)
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
Reply-To:	Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To:	Kazuhiro Fujieda <fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp>
cc:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com,
	Corinna Vinschen <corinna AT vinschen DOT de>
Subject:	Re: updated ld [Re: binutils snapshot -- problems?]
In-Reply-To:	<s1sg0w6cpcz.fsf@jaist.ac.jp>
Message-ID:	<Pine.HPP.3.96.1000110174005.22291F-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On 10 Jan 2000, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote:

> Unfortunately, the stripped new-cygwin1.dll still can't work on
> NT by the same reason as the previous.

Believe it or not, my copy runs fine on a Win98 machine, don't ask me 
why.

I've uploaded a new binutils snapshot, and this one is pretty close
what I've been using for a while locally. Please try it out and let
me. Both Cygwin B20.1 binaries and sources are there.

I just rebuilt everything from scratch, built the latest cygwin snapshot
on an NT 4.0 SP3 machine, stripped the DLL, and it still runs. And thanks
to making me skip lunch, now I'm starving and getting really cranky ;-)

ftp://ftp.xraylith.wisc.edu/pub/khan/gnu-win32/cygwin/snapshots/binutils-19990818/

binutils-19990818.1.tar.gz .......... sources.
binutils-19990818.1-cygb20.tar.gz ... binary package.

Regards,
Mumit

- Raw text -