Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id:	<199912100910.DAA01603@mercury.xraylith.wisc.edu>
To:	Andrew Dalgleish <andrewd AT axonet DOT com DOT au>
cc:	"'cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: snapshot-991207
In-Reply-To:	Your message of "Fri, 10 Dec 1999 14:54:37 +1100."
	<00F8D6E8AB0DD3118F1A006008186C9607C7CE AT server1 DOT axonet DOT com DOT au>
Date:	Fri, 10 Dec 1999 03:10:31 -0600
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT nanotech DOT wisc DOT edu>

Andrew Dalgleish <andrewd AT axonet DOT com DOT au> writes:
> 
> The cygcheck output below is from running winsup-19991207 
> (built on NT4sp5 + cygwin B20.1 + Mumit's gcc 2.95 + winsup-19991204)
> 

There's one potential problem here: there are a few bugs in the
w32api headers in winsup snapshots -- some of these are hidden
by bugs in v1.0 compiler and some of these were added to work
around the bug (mostly because it just worked!). There are only
a handful, all of these have to with incorrect packing in v1.0
compiler. I'm going to build winsup tomorrow with gcc-2.95.2 and 
see what gives.

Regards,
Mumit

- Raw text -