Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/1999/08/26/22:03:36
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dalgleish
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 1999 12:13
> To: 'Chris Faylor'
> Cc: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> Subject: RE: __small_sprintf
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Faylor [SMTP:cgf AT cygnus DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 1999 11:12
> To: Andrew Dalgleish
> Cc: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> Subject: Re: __small_sprintf
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:53:58AM +1000, Andrew Dalgleish
> wrote:
> >> From the ChangeLog:
> >>
> >> > Mon Aug 23 21:37:07 1999 Christopher Faylor
> <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
> >> > * times.cc (timezone): Use __small_sprintf.
> >>
> >> Did you test the change?
> >> The format string uses the '+'-modifier and __small_sprintf
> doesn't
> >> know
> >> this modifier. Therefor a '?' is inserted for the hour.
> >[Andrew Dalgleish]
> >Not directly related but...
> >After building winsup-src-19990823.tar.gz, uname now says my
> CPU is a
> >"i?ld".
> >This breaks configure in a big way. :-)
> >
> >(As expected, same result on 95, 98, and NT4)
>
> Actually, this should only be an issue for Windows 95 and
> Windows 98.
> [Andrew Dalgleish]
> My mistake.
> I do an automated build, install, build on all three.
> The 2nd build broke on all three, and I only checked why on two.
>
> I'll have a close look at the NT build.
[Andrew Dalgleish]
I'm not 100% sure, but I think a process running in a separate DOS box
loaded an earlier version of the DLL just as the 2nd build started.
Is there an easy way to test the DLL in isolation?
- Raw text -