Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<37879DFE.CE830B78@vinschen.de>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 21:24:46 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna AT vinschen DOT de>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language:	de,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-developers <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 19990705 snapshot
References:	<19990708172005 DOT A3884 AT cygnus DOT com> <6840 DOT 990710 AT logos-m DOT ru> <19990710133156 DOT A1241 AT cygnus DOT com>

Chris Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jul 10, 1999 at 08:10:34PM +0400, Egor Duda wrote:
> >>>Another question: has the CYGWIN=strace=1,somefile functionality been
> >>>deprecated with the advent of the strace program?
> >
> >CF> It hasn't been deprecated.  It has been removed.  You have to use
> >CF> the strace program.
> >
> >I've got some problems with new strace mechanism too :( Issuing
> >command
> >
> >strace -otrace.dump -f man man
> >
> >leads to some strange results.

I have another problem. I can't find any reason for this:
E.g.
	strace -o ls.out ls -l

leads into an empty trace output file. No other error or warning
message. Debugging is a little difficult in that way...
The result is the same with -f option. What's going wrong here???

Corinna

- Raw text -