delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Date: | Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:44:06 -0400 |
From: | Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> |
To: | Mumit Khan <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU> |
Cc: | cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Hey! A snapshot! |
Message-ID: | <19990627184406.A8416@cygnus.com> |
References: | <19990627172006 DOT A8388 AT cygnus DOT com> <199906272136 DOT QAA08646 AT mercury DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Mutt 0.95.3i |
In-Reply-To: | <199906272136.QAA08646@mercury.xraylith.wisc.edu>; from Mumit Khan on Sun, Jun 27, 1999 at 04:36:15PM -0500 |
On Sun, Jun 27, 1999 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Mumit Khan wrote: >Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> writes: >> It looks like our gcc problems have been worked around so there is a new >> 26-June-1999 snapshot available for the morbidly curious... > >Could you please explain a bit what these problems are/were and what >workarounds are needed? I would if I could. One problem was an internal compiler error when compiling syscalls.cc. Another was a "cc1 looping" problem when compiling environ.cc and others. I believe that both were due to internal Cygnus development that hadn't hit EGCS yet, but I could be mistaken. We received patches from g++ and gcc engineers that worked around the problem. They're awaiting review before being put into the main gcc sources. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |