delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Date: | Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:18:50 +0400 |
From: | Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru> |
X-Mailer: | The Bat! (v1.029) S/N A0F2A05A |
Reply-To: | Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru> |
Organization: | DEO |
Message-ID: | <17929.990622@logos-m.ru> |
To: | cygwin-developers <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
CC: | Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Massive checkin but still no memory corruption fix |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Hi! Jun 22 1999 Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> wrote: CF> I've also added the pseudo-JIT debugging from Egor Dada, although I CF> wouldn't recommend using quite yet. It has a tendency to invoke CF> itself a little aggressively. It obviously needs to be a little more CF> integrated with gdb. Does it mean that my assignment had finally come? I've just thought if i should send another copy. And what do you mean "aggressively"? I am to spend some time at weekend to do some additions and cleanups (like storing program name and signal in core file and more extensive parameters checking in dumper -- it traps itself one time while i'm using it). So it would be nice to hear your opinion on what else should be done. Egor. mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |