delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
X-Authentication-Warning: | modi.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs |
Date: | Tue, 11 May 1999 17:57:27 -0500 (CDT) |
From: | Mumit Khan <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> |
To: | Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> |
cc: | cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Subject: | Re: -lc == -lcygwin in the next release? |
In-Reply-To: | <19990511181107.A6957@cygnus.com> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.93.990511175533.26495C-100000@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Chris Faylor wrote: > Does anyone mind if I get rid of libcygwin.a in the next release > and just call it libc.a? Then when it is copied to /whatever/lib > it will work correctly when it is used on a command line. > I just suggested something similar in a post to cygwin list. The current situation causes gratuitous problems that can be solved by simply either linking libcygwin.a to libc.a or renaming libcygwin.a to libc.a. Either way, please please remove the newlib libc.a. Regards, Mumit
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |