delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Message-Id: | <199905102121.QAA02070@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu> |
X-Authentication-Warning: | modi.xraylith.wisc.edu: localhost.xraylith.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol |
To: | cygwin-developers <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
cc: | Mikey <jeffdb AT goodnet DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: new core files |
In-reply-to: | Your message of "Mon, 10 May 1999 16:45:36 EDT." |
<19990510164536 DOT C28227 AT cygnus DOT com> | |
Date: | Mon, 10 May 1999 16:21:56 -0500 |
From: | Mumit Khan <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU> |
Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> writes: > On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 07:48:00PM +0000, Mikey wrote: > >The reason that win32 doesn't support core dumps > >is that it supports JIT debugging. > > Didn't Egor's previous patch pretty much accomplish this? > > Core files definitely have a use that is not encompassed by JIT debugging. JIT is a good technology, but it's limited to interactive debugging as the name says. I've had people email me 100MB core dumps and that was the only way I could find certain problems that needed certain OS environment etc that I just couldn't reproduce. I believe JIT technology is capable of supporting these "post-mortem dumps", but it's a lot of work to get it right. I like core files. No wait, I hate core files ;-) Regards, Mumit
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |