Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	Tue, 4 May 1999 15:10:21 -0700
From:	Geoffrey Noer <noer AT cygnus DOT com>
To:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Cc:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Recent snapshots mount table lossage? Help needed.
Message-ID:	<19990504151021.B17802@cygnus.com>
References:	<19990504163254 DOT A31355 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.95.1i
In-Reply-To:	<19990504163254.A31355@cygnus.com>; from Chris Faylor on Tue, May 04, 1999 at 04:32:54PM -0400

On Tue, May 04, 1999, Chris Faylor wrote:
>
> I just had someone at Cygnus try a recent snapshot which I
> optimistically thought would solve a problem they were seeing with
> gdb.
> 
> The DLL seemed to unpack correctly but when I had the person do an
> 'ls' nothing showed up.  The snapshot works for me, so I'm wondering
> if there is some kind of mount table screwup somewhere?
> 
> Does anyone have a system which has only run B20.1 binaries that could
> be pressed into service?  I'd like to try the newest DLL on such a
> system along with the newest mount utility to see if the mount table is
> correctly translated and if `ls' works correctly.

I've heard of a problem where commands' output gets lost because of
cygwin1.dll DLL conflicts but haven't seen a reproducible test case...

-- 
Geoffrey Noer		Email: noer AT cygnus DOT com
Cygnus Solutions

- Raw text -