delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
From: | Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> |
Date: | Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:50:53 -0500 |
To: | cygwin-developers AT cygnus DOT com |
Subject: | Need opinions on "by invitation" status of cygwin-developers |
Message-ID: | <19990304105053.A1094@cygnus.com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Mutt 0.95.3i |
I'm getting an increasing number of requests from people who "just want to lurk" on the cygwin-developers mailing list. Usually I send them a polite "sorry, that's not what the list is for" message but I am getting worn down. What do people think? Should I just open up the list to everyone who's interested? My concern about doing this is that we will soon have a mirror of the cygwin mailing list with people asking how to define aliases in bash. There are at least two ways to do this: 1) Keep the mailing list status as is but allow "lurkers" on a case by case basis. 2) Open up the mailing list entirely and get me out of the loop as far as approvals are concerned. Opinions? cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |