Delivered-To:	listarch-cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Message-ID:	<19990201142232.A27502@cygnus.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 1999 14:22:32 -0500
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
Cc:	cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: tiny patch for execvp [Re: Problems with winsup-981223]
References:	<19981227212632 DOT A24196 AT cygnus DOT com> <199901300438 DOT UAA19176 AT cygnus DOT com> <19990130010435 DOT O10431 AT cygnus DOT com> <199901302309 DOT SAA00319 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <19990131001707 DOT A19124 AT cygnus DOT com> <36b4f822 DOT 165663739 AT mail DOT goodnet DOT com> <19990201103846 DOT A26507 AT cygnus DOT com> <199902011909 DOT OAA29894 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.93i
In-Reply-To:	<199902011909.OAA29894@envy.delorie.com>; from DJ Delorie on Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 02:09:58PM -0500
Sender:	owner-cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com

On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 02:09:58PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> If so, does that mean that this code would do something funky:
>> 
>> char *sys_errlist[];
>> main()
>> {
>>   puts(sys_errlist[1]);
>> }
>
>Yes.  sys_errlist would be the address of a chunk of i386 opcodes, not
>the address of the table of pointers to strings.

So, I think that I would vastly prefer the link time error to a
runtime core dump.

I've modified libiberty and will be testing this today.

-chris

- Raw text -