Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/1998/12/01/08:49:50
At 07:21 AM 12/1/98 -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>---Christopher Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> My only concern is that some target or other may have code which
>> relies on the current behavior even though it is non-standard.
>>
>
>But, that means the analyst is conforming to an undocumented feature.
>I'd rather it have a standard behavior, and since cygwin is supposed
>to be ANSI/POSIX standardized IMHO you should make the change without
>regard to what someone might currently be doing that is non-standard.
>
I'll second that. Better to break something for the sake of a standard
than to propagate a non-standard. In the end, the latter will be a
continuous up-hill battle.
Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc. (781) 239-1053
8 Grove Street (781) 239-1655 - FAX
Wellesley, MA 02482-7797 http://www.rfk.com
- Raw text -