Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/1998/04/16/11:54:17
Christopher G. Faylor wrote:
> I've been dreaming about this for a while, too. Is there any reason,
> other than speed, that dlltool couldn't emit C code to generate its
> import library? That would make this slightly easier to play with.
C code isn't neccessary - the C pseudo-code I wrote may be compiled to
assembly code very easy by hands. I think it will be ok, if dlltool will
create an assembler source for dynamic loader and will spawn as to compile
it - this will happen once for a library.
--
Sergey Okhapkin, http://www.lexa.ru/sos
Moscow, Russia
- Raw text -