Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/1998/03/01/23:13:32
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> This function explicitly sets the flags to 0. That seems to be what
> is causing my problem. I have no idea why I didn't notice that yesterday
> except that when I single stepped into the function I never hit that
> particular line, probably due to optimization.
>
> Is there a reason for that line, do you know? Things seems to work fine
> without it.
Looks like a bug... The line should be just removed.
--
Sergey Okhapkin, http://www.lexa.ru/sos
Moscow, Russia
Looking for a job.
- Raw text -