Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 9 Jun 2002 23:53:45 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [cygwin gcc-3.1] libjava/testsuite/lib/libjava.exp patch
Message-ID:	<20020610035345.GD6201@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020610013034 DOT GB31010 AT redhat DOT com> <20020610030447 DOT 38648 DOT qmail AT web14501 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20020610030447.38648.qmail@web14501.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:04:47PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> --- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at
>10:00:14AM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
>> >I didn't even notice the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw files, as I was
>> >working elsewhere.  I would prefer to use them and will make the 
>> >appropriate changes. 
>> 
>> I don't think they exist everywhere, yet.
>> 
>> Do you think we should use those exclusively, then?  I really don't have much
>> of an opinion on the matter.
>> 
>> Any opinion, Danny?
>
>My preference would be to use ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw everywhere. 

Ok.  That's what we previously agreed to but then I started having second thoughts.

ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw everywhere, it is.

cgf

- Raw text -