Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3CE3D1AC.40104@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 16 May 2002 11:35:08 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: new cygwin package: gsl
References:	<3CE2BE9B DOT 56A05CDB AT freeler DOT nl> <3CE2CB3A DOT 8070203 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020516110015 DOT F2671 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>

Corinna Vinschen wrote:


>>Packaging looks okay to me.  For later releases, you might think about 
>>re-enabling the libtool shared library support.  But for now, the static 
>>lib is great.
>>
> 
> Could you upload the package, Charles?

Well, I said *packaging* looks okay.  However, I object to the setup.hint:

category: Devel
requires:
sdesc:    "the GNU Scientific Library"
ldesc:    "the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical
routines for scientific computing."

This is not a development tool.  It's a library.  The category should be 
Libs.  And, it's a binary not a script, so it requires cygwin.  If Teun 
makes those changes, then sure, I'll upload...

--Chuck

- Raw text -